This is a sample report. It shows what you'll receive after completing the assessment. Your real report will be personalised to your answers.
Team Role Profile
Your Profile Report
Primary Style:
Strategist
Strategist as your strongest role means you see the big picture and set direction. Scarce and high-leverage on any team scaling past 15-20 people.
Dimension Scores
StrategistHigh
70%Action-Oriented — Highly Strategic
Seeing the big picture and setting direction
ConnectorModerate
60%Task-Focused — Highly Connected
Building relationships and bridging between people
InnovatorModerate
55%Conventional — Highly Innovative
Generating creative ideas and unconventional solutions
ImplementerModerate
55%Conceptual — Highly Implementation-Focused
Turning plans into practical action
CoordinatorModerate
50%Independent — Highly Coordinating
Organising people and resources effectively
AnalystModerate
50%Intuitive — Highly Analytical
Evaluating ideas critically and ensuring quality
Your profile in depth
A detailed read of each dimension at your score band, with what's likely a strength, what to watch, and where to invest.
Strategist
High · 70%
You set direction naturally. Scarce and load-bearing on scaling teams.
Strengths
Strategic framing
Sees across timeframes
Watch for
Can lose touch with execution reality
Try this
Stay close to execution
Pair with strong Implementers
From the research: Strategic orientation predicts team performance on non-routine work (Eisenhardt et al., 2010).
Connector
Moderate · 60%
Reasonable network without active cultivation.
Strengths
Functional
Watch for
Not a multiplier
Try this
Invest deliberately — compounds
From the research: Boundary-spanning predicts innovation and knowledge flow (Ancona & Caldwell, 1992).
Innovator
Moderate · 55%
Creative output is situational.
Strengths
Balanced
Watch for
Can be crowded out
Try this
Protect solo idea time
From the research: Team creativity benefits from at least one strong Innovator but declines with too many (Hülsheger et al., 2009).
Implementer
Moderate · 55%
You execute competently on your own commitments.
Strengths
Reliable
Watch for
Not a multiplier
Try this
Protect execution time
From the research: Implementation orientation predicts project delivery in time-bound work (Parker, 2003).
Coordinator
Moderate · 50%
You coordinate when needed.
Strengths
Can flex
Watch for
Not default lever
Try this
Claim coordination as growth area
From the research: Coordination role activity correlates with team effectiveness across industries (Marks et al., 2001).
Analyst
Moderate · 50%
Raises obvious concerns.
Strengths
Balanced
Watch for
Not the critical voice
Try this
Claim one 'what could go wrong' conversation per week
From the research: Critical evaluation within teams reduces groupthink (Nemeth, 1986).
Strengths
Strategist
Growth Areas
No low-scoring dimensions — nothing stands out as a growth area from this assessment.
Your Team Role Shape
Each team role is one face of a hexagon. Your scores pull each vertex out from the centre — the polygon that traces between them is your profile shape. Look for where the polygon reaches out and where it stays close to the centre: that's the shape of your contribution.
STRStrategist
70%
INNInnovator
55%
COOCoordinator
50%
IMPImplementer
55%
CONConnector
60%
ANAAnalyst
50%
Teams You'll Thrive In
Based on your top two roles, here are the team contexts most likely to reward your natural contribution — and one to steer clear of.
Teams that lean on your Strategist + Connector blend
You'll thrive where decisions have long-run consequences and leaders value someone who can sustain a big-picture view while the team moves tactically.
Pair with a strong Implementer
Your blind spot is the last 30% of delivery. An implementer sibling turns your direction into shipped work.
Add an Analyst for high-stakes bets
When strategy meets irreversible decisions, an analyst stress-tests your reasoning before resources are committed.
You can do firefighting, but you'll under-deliver on direction-setting if that's where most of your week goes.
Roles That Complement You
Your profile reaches least toward these two roles. That's fine — nobody covers the full hexagon. Teams that include strong scorers in these roles will round out what you don't naturally bring.
Coordinator
Analyst
Role-by-Role Deep Dive
Each of the six roles with the strengths it brings, the risks it carries when overused, and the specific contribution it makes to a team.
STR
Strategist
Reliable · 70%
Strategists zoom out. They see how pieces fit together, where the team is headed, and which bets deserve the biggest investment.
Strengths
Holds the long view when others get caught in the week
Frames ambiguous problems into clear directions
Comfortable reasoning about second-order effects
Watch for
Can under-invest in near-term execution detail
May lose team members who need day-to-day clarity more than horizon-setting
Team contribution: You set the direction that lets everyone else prioritise — without your lens, teams tend to treat every task as equally urgent.
INN
Innovator
Reliable · 55%
Innovators generate new angles. They question defaults, notice what's missing, and push the team toward ideas nobody else would propose.
Strengths
Reframes problems from unexpected directions
Comfortable in ambiguity and incomplete information
Generates volume of options before the team converges
Watch for
Can over-produce ideas without shipping any
May clash with implementers who prefer a clear brief
Team contribution: You're where new ideas come from. Teams without an innovator default to the obvious answer and miss the better one sitting just off-centre.
COO
Coordinator
Situational · 50%
Coordinators make teams function. They sequence work, match people to tasks, and keep the collective machinery moving.
Strengths
Sees who's best placed for which work
Manages interdependencies without them breaking
Keeps meetings productive and decisions traceable
Watch for
Can over-orchestrate and under-deliver individually
May become a single-point-of-failure the team routes everything through
Team contribution: You're the connective tissue. Without a coordinator teams do twice the work for half the output because nobody's sequencing it.
IMP
Implementer
Reliable · 55%
Implementers ship. They turn plans into shipped work, hold a quality bar, and resist letting scope drift past the finish line.
Strengths
Converts abstract plans into concrete deliverables
High tolerance for repeated, careful work
Flags hand-wave plans that won't survive contact with reality
Watch for
May resist genuinely better ideas that arrive late
Can clash with innovators who keep adjusting the target
Team contribution: You're the reason work actually gets done. Teams without strong implementers produce beautiful plans that never ship.
CON
Connector
Reliable · 60%
Connectors build the social fabric. They broker relationships inside and outside the team, and they notice when people are struggling before anyone else does.
Strengths
Builds trust across group boundaries
Reads team mood and surfaces friction early
Pulls in expertise from unexpected parts of the organisation
Watch for
Can over-absorb emotional labour others should be carrying
May be underestimated on technical contribution because their work is relational
Team contribution: You're how the team connects to the rest of the world — and how people stay engaged once things get hard.
ANA
Analyst
Situational · 50%
Analysts test ideas rigorously. They pressure-check assumptions, pick apart proposals, and make sure the team isn't mistaking enthusiasm for evidence.
Strengths
Spots logical gaps before they cost the team
Weighs evidence dispassionately
Raises the quality bar on decisions
Watch for
Can critique plans to a standstill
May be read as negative when they're just being thorough
Team contribution: You're the filter that keeps bad ideas out of the build. Teams without an analyst invest heavily in convincing-sounding plans that don't survive scrutiny.
About this assessment
Team Role research originates with Belbin's (1981) work at Henley Management College. The core insight: effective teams need a diverse mix of roles, not just talented individuals. Your profile shows which roles come most naturally to you.
Team composition effects on performance are real but smaller than popular accounts suggest (Aritzeta et al., 2007). Roles are useful for self-awareness and team composition, not rigid identities. Most people perform 2-3 roles well.