This is a sample report. It shows what you'll receive after completing the assessment. Your real report will be personalised to your answers.

DISC Behavioural Assessment · Under Pressure

Under Pressure — Sam

Primary Style:

Dominance

A high-Dominance style is the classic results-first operator: direct, time-pressured, and willing to push for outcomes through friction. Research on assertive leadership (Ames & Flynn, 2007) suggests D-types are rated highly for getting things done but can lose impact if their directness outpaces colleagues' readiness to hear it. Your best work tends to happen when you're given a real problem, real authority, and a clear finish line.

Your DISC Behavioural Assessment shape Further from the centre = higher score on that dimension.
Dominance: 70% (High) Influence: 55% (Moderate) Steadiness: 50% (Moderate) Conscientiousness: 55% (Moderate) Dominance 70% Influence 55% Steadiness 50% Conscientiousness 55%

Dimension Scores

  • Dominance High
    70% Accommodating — Dominant

    Direct, decisive, competitive

  • Influence Moderate
    55% Reserved — Influential

    Enthusiastic, optimistic, collaborative

  • Steadiness Moderate
    50% Dynamic — Steady

    Patient, reliable, team-oriented

  • Conscientiousness Moderate
    55% Flexible — Conscientious

    Analytical, precise, quality-focused

Your profile in depth

A detailed read of each dimension at your score band, with what's likely a strength, what to watch, and where to invest.

Dominance

High · 70%

You run hot on drive. You'll push through resistance, break tie-votes, and accept interpersonal cost to move things forward. This is a strong CEO/founder profile but it taxes colleagues who need more processing time.

Strengths

  • Breaks decision deadlocks
  • High tolerance for conflict and ambiguity
  • Strong bias toward action

Watch for

  • Can be read as abrasive or dismissive
  • Risks running over detail-focused teammates
  • Impatience with process-heavy work

Try this

  • Add an explicit 'listen first' step to high-stakes conversations
  • Sponsor an S or C teammate — their carefulness will save you
  • Use a 24-hour rule before sending hottest-take emails

From the research: Dominance maps most closely to assertiveness and low agreeableness in Big-Five terms; meta-analyses show assertive styles predict emergent leadership (Judge et al., 2002).

Influence

Moderate · 55%

You're comfortable in groups without needing the spotlight. You can warm up a room when required and retreat into focused work when you need to — a flexibility that plays well across role types.

Strengths

  • Credible in both group and solo settings
  • Reads audience well
  • Doesn't exhaust easily in either mode

Watch for

  • Can under-invest in network-building
  • May default to task mode when relational mode is needed

Try this

  • Schedule one genuinely social interaction per week with no agenda
  • Notice which mode drains you and recover deliberately

From the research: Influence correlates strongly with Big-Five Extraversion; meta-analytic work (Judge et al., 2002) shows E predicts leader emergence (ρ ≈ 0.33) but only modestly predicts leader effectiveness.

Steadiness

Moderate · 50%

You're adaptable without being volatile. You can absorb change and still deliver against established rhythms — a profile that quietly carries most of the work in mature teams.

Strengths

  • Reliable under moderate change
  • Comfortable with both new and familiar work
  • Low-drama transitions

Watch for

  • Strengths can be taken for granted
  • May under-signal when change is costing you

Try this

  • Track your change load explicitly so stakeholders see it
  • Notice when 'steady' is being used as code for 'optional'

From the research: Steadiness tracks with low Neuroticism + high Agreeableness; longitudinal research (Roberts et al., 2007) links these profiles to relationship stability and lower workplace conflict.

Conscientiousness

Moderate · 55%

You're careful where it matters and pragmatic where it doesn't. You've internalised which work warrants rigour — a judgement that usually takes years to develop.

Strengths

  • Appropriate rigour, not performative rigour
  • Can switch modes by stakes
  • Coaches others on where precision matters

Watch for

  • Can under-invest in quality when deadlines compress
  • May be invisible on work that needs a named quality owner

Try this

  • Name your quality bar explicitly on high-stakes work
  • Watch for 'moderate' drifting into 'optional' under pressure

From the research: Conscientiousness is the most robust personality predictor of job performance across occupations (Barrick & Mount 1991, meta-analytic ρ ≈ 0.22) and a strong predictor of longevity (Kern & Friedman, 2008).

Strengths

  • Dominance

Growth Areas

No low-scoring dimensions — nothing stands out as a growth area from this assessment.

Under Pressure

Working with Sam when the heat is on

A colleague-facing read of how this profile behaves when stress spikes. Share this with the people who sprint alongside them — incident responders, launch partners, anyone in a high-pressure window — so nobody is caught off-guard by a predictable stress response.

Their blend under normal conditions

The Inspirational Driver

You blend drive with warmth — results-focused and people-oriented at once. You lead with confidence and charisma, pushing toward ambitious goals while bringing others with you.

Below is what tends to happen when the operating conditions shift — short deadlines, ambiguous scope, mounting stakes.

Pressure Behaviours — what to expect from each dimension

Each DiSC dimension has a characteristic pressure response. Their profile blends these in proportion to their scores: a high-D dimension will show up more visibly under stress than a low-D one.

D

Dominance

Their score: 70%

At their best

Decisive, outcome-focused, willing to drive hard decisions.

Under pressure

Can become blunt, impatient, or dismissive of others' input. Watch for steamrolling teammates when deadlines compress.

I

Influence

Their score: 55%

At their best

Energising, persuasive, builds momentum through optimism.

Under pressure

May over-promise, skim detail, or confuse enthusiasm for agreement. Watch for commitments that cross weeks without firm follow-through.

S

Steadiness

Their score: 50%

At their best

Reliable, patient, steadies teams through change and ambiguity.

Under pressure

Can retreat, resist useful change, or over-absorb others' stress. Watch for quiet loyalty past the point of benefit.

C

Conscientiousness

Their score: 55%

At their best

Accurate, analytical, catches what others miss.

Under pressure

May default to perfectionism, analysis paralysis, or critical detachment. Watch for shipping delays when the standard becomes unrealistic.

Typical stress triggers for this profile

Environmental conditions that tend to flip the switch. Not every trigger fires for every person, but patterns at this blend make these worth watching for.

  • Unclear goals with a fast clock. Ambiguity combined with urgency pulls every DiSC style into its worst habits — know which way yours pulls first.
  • Public scrutiny of incomplete work. Reviews, demos, or sudden visibility before the work is ready can tip confidence into defensiveness.
  • Repeated last-minute reversals. Decisions that flip after commitment drain trust and predict a sharper stress response the next time.
  • Conflict without a facilitator. Two people going hard at each other without a neutral third party escalates faster than most profiles can absorb.

Do's and don'ts during a high-stress window

Short, specific, and colleague-facing. These are the moves that tend to help (or quietly backfire) during a sprint, an incident, or a crunch week.

Do

  • Give direct feedback — they'll respect candour over careful hedging
  • Frame asks around outcomes, not process
  • Respect their time in meetings; lead with the headline
  • Match their preferred pace — faster for D/I, more measured for S/C

Don't

  • Bury the point in preamble or long setup
  • Assume enthusiasm equals a firm commitment
  • Expect instant buy-in on major change without time to process
  • Mistake calm exterior for disengagement

Recovery strategies

What tends to help this profile reset after a pressure spike. If you work alongside them, knowing the recovery move is as important as knowing the stress response.

  • Give them a clean closure. Post-mortems, retrospectives, or a simple “that's shipped” moment help this profile close the loop and release residual stress.
  • Protect a recovery window. Back-to-back sprints compound. A clear gap — even a single day without a new ask — pays back multiples.
  • Follow up 1:1, not in a group thread. If something escalated during the crunch, repair privately first. Group repair without a private conversation first often lands flat.
  • Acknowledge the specific contribution. Generic thanks ages poorly. Name the exact move that made the difference and the impact it had.

About this assessment

DISC descends from William Marston's 1928 Emotions of Normal People, which framed behaviour along two axes: how you perceive the environment (favourable vs antagonistic) and how you respond to it (active vs reflective). Modern DISC instruments retain Marston's four quadrants — Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness — and remain one of the most widely used behavioural frameworks in talent development, with workplace validation studies showing meaningful links to team fit and communication preferences.

Although DISC is not a personality measure in the strict Big Five sense, decades of construct-validity work map its factors onto assertiveness (D), sociability (I), equanimity (S), and carefulness (C). Use DISC to describe *observable behaviour* — the way you show up to colleagues — rather than deep personality traits.

Sign Up to Take This Assessment View Pricing